Collaboration American University in Bulgaria (AUBG) and Denison U

Intercultural Learning through a Globally Connected German Language Classroom: An International Project between Denison University and the American University in Bulgaria
Presented by Dr. Diana STANTCHEVA (AUBG, Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria)
Dr. Gabriele DILLMANN (Denison University, Granville, OH, USA)
The language classroom is a most fruitful place for intercultural, global learning. Digital technologies allow us to make intercultural connections like never before and in the process language learning benefits from real communication about real issues. Connecting two language courses globally requires overcoming many obstacles and challenges (time difference, collaboration, technology, funding, resources, etc.) but a strong belief that the benefits outweigh the costs serves as a constant source for pushing on. 
The goal of our project (started in Fall semester 2013) was – and continues to be – to enrich our connected courses with an intercultural perspective through the direct exchange between students and faculty members as we discuss shared small group assignments via Google Hangout and Google doc shared writing assignments (of course, “traditional” technologies such as email and skype compliment the exchanges) all the while expanding and enhancing student’s language skills in German.
Our paper will provide a research summary, describe in detail how we pursued the described goals with a special focus on the digital technologies we used and their pedagogical value, and will give a candid assessment of what worked well and what needs further exploration. We will also discuss the next step of the project, namely aligning the courses synchronously via video-conferencing technologies in addition to the Hangouts.
Find out more here.

For the conference overview go here.



Modern Neuroscience and Freud Event

The Association for Psychoanalytic Thought offered another superb event this past Friday at the Cincinnati Psychoanalytic Institute. With renewed interest in Freud’s scientific ideas by contemporary leading neuroscientists such as Mark Solms and Oliver Turnbull, not to forget the role Freud had played in Nobel Laureate Eric Kandel’s life and work, this event was especially timely and relevant. (Also Discover Mag currently has a cover article on Freud’s “second-coming”.)

Konstantin Bakhurin who is completing his PhD in the Neuroscience program at UCLA, gave a highly informative talk  as the first of two speakers on the subject of contemporary neuroscience and Freud. His topic: Learning-dependent modulation and potential neurological correlates for past experience influencing present behavior; a model to provide understanding of Freud’s ID, Ego, and Superego as ‘residing’ in the brain as an effect of its organization and interaction function. I especially appreciated Konstantin’s cultural approach to Freud and psychoanalytic thought in his introduction providing us with the context in which psychoanalytic ideas – and precursors to those – were shaped and processed by thinkers, scientists, and artists alike. This culture of cross-fertilization set the tone in the late 19th century for the advancement of psychoanalytic thought and this renewed, respectful treatment of Freud’s scientific ideas within a growing neuropsychoanalytic community promises to lead to a fruitful period for collaborative research between the arts, humanities and sciences. (In this context also of interest is Eric Kandel’s new book The Age of Insight and an interview by Die Zeit with the author.)

For Konstantin’s full talk, please visit here:

Further suggested readings:

Linden, D.J. (2007) The accidental mind: How brain evolution has given us love, memory, dreams, and God. (Book Review)

Burton, Robert (2013) A Skeptic’s Guide to the Mind

Demasio, Antonio (2012) Self Comes to Mind

Panksepp, Jaak (2012) Archaeology of Mind

Obituary of David Hubel

This is a great collection of review articles on the various kinds of representations of the outside world in the brain that are typically studied in neuroscience. People should have access to these through their university library:

The second talk by Dr. Marcia Kaplan, practicing psychiatrist and psychoanalytic therapist was equally inspiring and in the same spirit as the first speaker’s. Its topic: Findings regarding firing of single neurons correlating with psychoanalytic models explaining behavior; information-processing in “bottom-up” and “top-down” ways by both brain and mind. Rich in background information and context with helpful examples made for an illustrative presentation of complex ideas that became accessible to a appreciative and interested audience.

For Dr. Kaplan’s full talk, please visit here:

Further Readings:

Podcast by Jaak Panksepp

Panksepp, Jaak (2004) Affective Neuroscience

A special thank you to Christian Faur, Director of Collaborative Technologies Fine and Performing Arts at Denison University for professionally capturing and editing these talks.


The Renaissance of Psychoanalytic Thought: Studying Freud in the 21st Century

Check out my new course!

Comments and suggestions are welcome!!

This course is designed to incorporate CLAC (Cultures and Languages across the Curriculum) pedagogy. Please see the respective CLAC components within the individual topical units.

Title: The Renaissance of Psychoanalytic Thought: Studying Freud in the 21st Century


Modern Neuroscience and Freud Event

Modern Neuroscience and Freud

The Association for Psychoanalytic Thought (APT) is pleased to present “Modern Neuroscience and Freud” at 7PM on Friday, March 21st, 2014, at the Cincinnati Psychoanalytic Institute, 3001 Highland Ave, Cincinnati, Ohio 45219.

Konstantin Bakhurin of the systems/computational neuroscience laboratory at UCLA will discuss learning-dependent modulation and potential neurological correlates for past experience influencing present behavior; this is a possible model for understanding Freud’s ID, EGO, and SUPER-EGO as  ‘residing’ in the brain as an effect of its organization and interacting function.

Marcia Kaplan, Institute Faculty Member, Board certified in psychiatry and psychoanalysis, Board eligible in neurology, and practicing psychiatrist and psychoanalytic psychotherapist, will discuss findings involving firing of single neurons correlating with psychoanalytic models explaining behavior and information – processing in “bottom-up” and “top-down” ways by both brain and mind.

Please RSVP early by calling 513-515-6836 or by emailing

Gabriele Dillmann and Christian Faur from Denison University will digitally capture this event and the institute will make it available on their website. A link will be posted here as well.

If you cannot attend but wish to participate with questions or comments, please submit these to me via email and I will post them here. 

Question from Kurt Grahnke, Denison University (submitted March 19th via email from Germany)

Although Freud did have a background in neurology, when he was developing his psychoanalytic theory, he did not intend for his models of the psyche to have neuroanatomical correlates. What sorts of problems do you run into when trying to map models of the psyche onto models of the brain, with the psyche having a different ontological nature than the brain? What benefits can be derived from doing so? – Perhaps a more holistic way of understanding behavior, specifically neurotic behavior?

MOOCing the Liberal Arts?

Succinct summary of Westmont Conversation on MOOCing the Liberal Arts by Alexandra Juhasz from Pitzer College (

Let me add some of my own photos from the conference here:

Image 7 Image 6 Image 5


I had the opportunity to speak this past weekend with my colleague and friend, Liz Losh, about the FemTechNet DOCC2013 as part of the Gaede Institute’s yearly conversation on the Liberal Arts, this one on MOOCs. The Institute’s director, Christian Hoekley, put together a compelling program where both critics and successful practitioners of recent MOOCs joined in conversation with a small, engaged, thoughtful crowd of interlocutors to think, in particular, about the challenges of technologically enhanced/corporate/computer delivered education within the context of a liberal education that might seem diametrically opposed to the aims of most mainstream MOOC‘s: bent as they are to serve many, many, many customers, efficiently, conveniently, for free (or at low cost or via the “noblesse oblige” of the wealthy few [Astin]), leaving in the dust the traditional teacher/professor, brick and mortar classroom, and its well-established norms of community, conversation, and care.


View original post 464 more words

On MOOCs – Final Class Stanford Educ217x/CompLit

Dear All,

here is our Hangout session from yesterday’s last class at Stanford in Educ217x/Comp Lit. I thought the class with Hangout went really well! And we had fun, too!

As you can tell by watching the video, the content did not suffer from the media at all, the discussion was rich and engaging, AND we now have a recording of the class for future reference or for sharing. What still needs a little more attention, in regard to sharing, is the overall quality of the recording itself, i.e. we need to make sure that the individuals speaking are positioned behind the camera to where they are more optimally captured (rule of 2/3rd’s, distance to laptop camera, framing of body and face, movement). Lighting was very good, so was sound. The feedback from the third computer in the room (Tasha’s) could be because of where the laptop itself was positioned, one would have to play with that beforehand. But all that is required, really, are relatively small adjustments and with a little mindfulness and practice such a recording can be perfected with relatively simple means.

One technical thing that I learned: once you turn the camera off, i.e. the broadcasting/recording camera, you have to restart the whole hangout session to turn it back on. That is why I missed to record Kipp’s and Tasha’s presentation. Had I left the Hangout, it would have been disruptive for the flow of the presentation because I would have had to re-invite everybody in the middle of it all. Sorry about that, Kipp and Tasha. Now we know better! Perhaps you can send me your PPT? And even worse, I missed recording the gift presentation by the students for David, Mitchell, and Candice! The creativity and thoughtfulness behind it speaks volumes, so I’ll attach the digital version to this message for everybody to see (with a special thanks to mastermind Stew!).

Connecting three inter-institutional classrooms effectively (here Duke/Stanford/UCSB), in my opinion, is also possible, but we would all need to confer and agree on the logistical and technical details beforehand. As interesting as they were overall, there was too much of a plurality of technical set-ups and digital pedagogies to give the meetings the coherence they would have benefitted from.

Still, the big question is though (given that technology does not get in the way): what can three connected classrooms accomplish that two or even one couldn’t? I have some ideas, but I would love to hear from your guys what your take is on that. I would like to “digest” your responses in my blog analysis. If you could give that question a few thoughts and mail your responses to me, I’d be very grateful. In return, I will share the pictures, recordings, ideas, comments about the class in a blog site with you as a sort of memento. Dankeschön!

It was such a pleasure thinking and playing with you all throughout the course!! Please stay in touch and as Arnold would say in impeccable English “I’ll be back!” 🙂


I’ll also attach the doc on MOOCs we were discussing here, since not everybody may have access to it.

Comp Lit 265: Histories and Futures of Humanistic Education: Culture and Crisis, Books and MOOCs, Stanford University, Winter Quarter 2014.

Collection of MOOC Resources

This document is a product of students in “Histories and Futures of Humanistic Education,” a course which asks students to develop a historical and cultural contextual understanding of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC). In the first section, you will find a hearty compilation of contemporary news articles aimed to provide the reader with an introductory knowledge base about MOOCs. The second section poses a series of questions students in the classroom found especially interesting after three weeks of classroom discussions and readings about the history of US higher education. In an attempt to begin to answer some of the questions posed in section two, the final portion of the document is a compilation of relevant reads and videos,  which respectively fall under the broad headings of “Education and Innovation” and “Relationships/Interaction/Pedagogy.”

Compiled by:

Gabriele Dillmann (Gabriele Dillmann, Julian H. Robertson Jr. Professor, Modern Languages/German, Denison University, Granville, OH. Student in course.)

Kipp Johnson (Joint degree student MBA/MA Education @ Stanford, expected graduation 2015)

Natasha Patel (Pursuing a B.A. of Philosophy at Stanford University, expected graduation 2016)

Table of Contents

1. Introduction to MOOCs: selected background information to get you started

2. Some (early) Example MOOCs

3. Critical Thinking Questions: concepts we find particularly interesting about MOOCs

4. Education and Innovation/Social issues

5. Relationships/Interaction/Pedagogy

1. Introduction to MOOCs

A short video about MOOCs and the connected age.

7 Things You Should Know About MOOCs II (2013):

·      [B]ecause of the scale of most MOOCs, vast amounts of data are being generated that, when analyzed and more fully understood, will benefit not only future MOOCs but also education in other delivery models.

·      Recently instructors at several institutions expressed reservations about MOOCs, criticizing them for providing a mass-market education and devaluing direct faculty-student interaction.

·      Although MOOCs might be designed around content mastery rather than course completion, some find the completion rates—often less than 10%—troubling.

·      [P]articipants enroll in MOOCs for a wide range of reasons, from curiosity about a topic to preparation for credit by examination, and, as a result, the value of peer work such as forums and discussion might be uneven.

·      Perhaps the MOOC’s most important contribution to date has been to raise important questions and spark essential conversations about curriculum design, accreditation, what constitutes a valid learning experience, and who has access to higher education.

The MOOC Guide by Educause:

The purpose of this document is two-fold:

– to offer an online history of the development of the Massive Open Online Course (MOOC)

– to use that history to describe major elements of a MOOC

Each chapter of this guide looks at one of the first MOOCs and some early influences. It contains these parts:

– a description of the MOOC, what it did, and what was learned

– a description of the element of MOOC theory learned in the offering of the course

– practical tools that can be used to develop that aspect of a MOOC

– practical tips on how to be successful

What is a MOOC – by Dave Cormier

NY Times = The Year of the MOOC

Chronicle of Higher Ed

Excellent resource: chronology of MOOCS with major milestones and respective articles – up to August 2013

Bill Gates on MOOCS

Published on Mar 19, 2013

Inside Higher Ed’s Doug Lederman moderates a panel on MOOCs at ACE’s 95th Annual Meeting, March 5, 2013, in Washington, DC. Participants included Peter Lange, provost at Duke University; Anant Agarwal, president of EdX; Daphne Koller, co-founder of Coursera; and Kevin P. Reilly, president of the University of Wisconsin System.

How Free Online Courses Are Changing Traditional Education

PBS Published on Jan 8, 2013

As tuition costs continue to rise, it seems counterintuitive that professors at top universities would give away their courses for free. But that’s exactly what they’re doing, on web-based platforms known as “Massive Open Online Courses.” Spencer Michels reports on how a boom in online learning could change higher education.

CNI: Massive Open Online Courses as Drivers for Change

Published Dec 19, 2012 Lynne O’Brien, Director, Academic Technology & Instructional Services, DukeU

Innovation Imperative: Change Everything

A NYT article from Clayton Christensen (Harvard Business School legend) talking about how “disruptive innovation” may impact higher ed.  References several MOOCs, the Minerva Project, and also talks about the University of Phoenix.

MOOC Journal:

MOOCs Forum is the only international publication dedicated exclusively to shaping the future development, design, and deployment of massive, open, online courses (MOOCs). Multidisciplinary in scope, this authoritative Forum evaluates the components and modules that are critical in creating a global education system and sustainable revenue models for MOOCs, as well as enforcing the integrity behind the creation and use of these systems.

The impetus to move our educational system forward is ongoing, yet considerations relevant to the success of MOOCs have not been fully addressed. MOOCs Forum is the catalyst for meaningful discussion and debate on the impact of these disruptive educational models.

New book on MOOCs:

Invasion of the MOOCs: The Promise and Perils of Massive Open Online Courses edited by Steven Krause and Charles Lowe

Free download of entire book!!

2. Earlier MOOC Examples

– The original course that started Udacity: An example of one of the first MOOC classes to gain traction.

– One of the first Coursera MOOCs: Another example of one an early MOOC.  This is the updated version, we are trying to get footage from the original so you can see the improvements made over the last two years.

– Using a social gaming platform:  A blog post from Coursera advertising the use of “social gaming” to improve student engagement.  The course uses online multiplayer games to give students opportunities to practice the concepts taught in the course (and win points by beating each other in quizzes).

3. Critical Thinking Questions


•       What to do with the data?  Can MOOCs help provide the metrics or measurable impact needed to convince the business world of the value of a liberal arts education?

•       How will MOOCs affect “brand” in Education?  E.g., does the benefit of visibility outweigh the potential “brand dilution” factor for universities?

•       How can collaboration through MOOCs actually enhance outcomes?  E.g., can “crowd sourcing” ideas from a wide audience yield better (or just different) insights from having a single professor teaching?

•       Superstars or communities? Should MOOCs be highlighting a single “superstar” professor to disseminate “the best” point of view, or should MOOCs focus on establishing dynamic communities (e.g., link classes between universities instead of exclusive).

Similar to the previous point, can MOOCs have a “knowledge creation” role in addition to the “knowledge dissemination”?  And along with that, is it important to pair research and teaching the way they have traditionally been linked in universities?


I am particularly interested in how MOOCs can (can they?) foster relationships holistically or at all?

Learning styles vary significantly. What kind of learning styles does mooc-learning neglect? Promote?

What subjects/ideas/material/behavior/social skills can and cannot be taught via/in MOOCs?

What sort of learning do MOOCs promote especially well and what sorts less so?


1. Some say online education has resulted in a significant change in the style of teaching; for example, “teaching has become a team sport.” In what ways do/will data and metrics retrieved from MOOC instruction influence teaching pedagogy in higher education?

2. MOOCs possess a low barrier to entry because they are both easily accessible (given a person has access to a computer) and low-cost. What steps need to be taken in order to ensure MOOCs do not become another tool of elites (those furthering their education, professional schools)? What needs to happen to make MOOCs the savior of the common man?

3. MOOCs give us hope for a future where all individuals are able to access higher education regardless by lowering barriers of cost and accessibility. Yet, what implications will this have for class divisions? WIll it pronounce a separation between the kind and quality of education elites receive versus middle and lower class persons?

4. The internet and social media tools changed the game of journalism by allowing anyone, anywhere to “publish” pieces, information, and opinion online without critical review. Will this also be the future of higher education? Do MOOCs present a challenge for maintaining the role universities play in determining what knowledge is worthy of credential? How can we overcome this and maintain the credibility of knowledge disseminated online?
4. Education and Innovation/Social Issues

For whom are we reinventing college?

limited public awareness of MOOCS

California puts MOOC Bill on Ice,  August 1, 2013

Faculty unions strongly opposed it, and later drafts of the bill would give faculty-governance bodies more oversight of what outside courses could count for credit.

Interesting contribution by Joanna Huang from Educ217X

Can we find a way to incorporate art/creative work into online learning/MOOCs that is engaging and culturally responsive/sensitive?

MOOC Fans Step out of the Shadows

Surprising data from first wave of massive open online courses show most students are male, educated, and living in a developed country.

— and pairing it with this NPR Talk —

Community Colleges Missing the Mark for Men of Color

Community college is seen as a good option for students who can’t afford four-year colleges. But a recent report finds community colleges aren’t effectively serving male students of color.

5. Relationships/Interaction/Pedagogy

Amin Saberi, a Stanford professor and the start-up company’s founder and chief executive, said there’s a key difference between NovoEd and existing MOOC options: peer interaction. and Intention in Massive Open Online Courses: In DepthEDUCAUSE Review, June 2013. This article argues that retention in MOOCs should be considered carefully in the context of learner intent, especially given the varied backgrounds and motivations of students who choose to enroll.

The Pedagogical Foundations of MOOCs, article by Glance, Forsey, Riley.

..Although not specifically designed to optimise learning, claims have been made that MOOCs are based on sound pedagogical foundations that are at the very least comparable with courses offered by universities in face–to–face mode. To validate this, we examined the literature for empirical evidence substantiating such claims. Although empirical evidence directly related to MOOCs was difficult to find, the evidence suggests that there is no reason to believe that MOOCs are any less effective a learning experience than their face–to–face counterparts. Indeed, in some aspects, they may actually improve learning outcomes.

Freshman Writing MOOC (17K students), pros and cons; here cons:  (june, 2013)

Key comments:

·      While our instructional team wanted to help them complete this work off-line—many students have very limited Internet access—we could not provide a way to do so. We pressed Coursera support-staff members for a solution, but they could not provide one.

·      My limited ability to make key pedagogical choices is the most frustrating aspect of teaching a MOOC. Because of the way the Coursera platform is constructed, such wide-ranging decisions have been hard-coded into the softwaredecisions that seem to have no educational rationale and that thwart the intent of our course.

·       And, of course, there is the question of how to evaluate the writing of thousands of students. The only way to accomplish that is to rely entirely on peer review and peer -assessment. But first, as part of a required training module, students must read sample essays that are scored, and test themselves against those scores.

·       “Because of the way the Coursera platform is constructed, such wide-ranging decisions have been hard-coded into the software—decisions that seem to have no educational rationale and that thwart the intent of our course.”  And if someone working closely with Coursera can’t get an answer as to why and how those decisions were made, you can just imagine the level of customer support and responsiveness would be offered to the rest of us.

Self-Driven Mastery in Massive Open Online Courses

Chuong B. Do, Zhenghao Chen, Relly Brandman, Daphne Koller

MOOCs FORUM. September 2013, 1(P): 14-16.

Udacity Founder Sebastian Thrun (Jan. 2012)

and then Jan 1, 2014.

Thrun: “…we have a lousy product.”

On Petra Dierkes-Thrun’s blog: Bill of Rights and Principles for Learning in a Digital Age

Everything in Moderation/Behavior – January 23, 2014

The Pedagogy of MOOCs

Good blog with interesting information on the early digital tech pedagogy.

How do Learners Advocate for Themselves in a Class of 16K?

“All of this stems from my own experience this week in the greater than tweet-length “The History and Future of (Mostly) Higher Education: Or, How We Can Unlearn Our Old Patterns and Relearn for a Happier, More Productive, Ethical, and Socially-Engaged Future” (hereto after fantastically abbreviated as #FutureEd) being led by Cathy Davidson.”

University of Pennsylvania professor Al Filreis leads a conversation at Columbia on “Open Access Humanities, Open Pedagogy: Exploring the Communitarian Possibilities of MOOCs”!

MOOCs in the liberal arts conversation at Westmont College

MOOCing the Liberal Arts? Technology and Relationship in Liberal Arts Education

The Thirteenth Annual Conversation on the Liberal Arts

February 13 – 15, 2014, Santa Barbara


“The Open Letter to Michael Sandel and Thoughts about Online Teaching”

Peter Hadreas, Philosophy Department, San José State University, Philosophy Department

May 2, 2013: ‘An Open Letter to Professor Michael Sandel From the Philosophy Department at San Jose State U.’ Professors in the philosophy department at San Jose State University wrote this letter to make a direct appeal to Michael Sandel, a Harvard professor whose MOOC on “Justice” they were being encouraged to use as part of the San Jose State curriculum.

Related Article:

The authors say they fear “that two classes of universities will be created: one, well-funded colleges and universities in which privileged students get their own real professor; the other, financially stressed private and public universities in which students watch a bunch of videotaped lectures and interact, if indeed any interaction is available on their home campuses, with a professor that this model of education has turned into a glorified teaching assistant.”

Includes a very interesting discussion by MOOC advocates.

Response from Professor Sandler:

“MOOCs, the Morning After”

Alexandra Juhasz, Pitzer College and Elizabeth Losh, UC San Diego.

Alexandra Juhasz and Elizabeth Losh are leading thinkers in gender and technology and developers of an alternative model to MOOCs, the Distributed Open Collaborative Course (DOCC).

– intentionally building feminist notions into digital learning.

DOCC 2013 Facultyhave developed an open-ended structure for Teaching & Learning Resources that reflects some of our shared pedagogical philosophies and priorities—including anti-racist, anti-colonial, trans*, queer and crip feminist content and teaching methods.”

Also of interest:…

Alexandra (Juhasz,  — thanks for the excellent summary on the Westmont conversation!! Paper: “Plato’s Massive Open Online Cave?” by Mark McIntire, Santa Barbara City College, Philosophy Department

“‘Learning-how –to-learn is generally regarded as the great advantage of a liberal arts education … the crucial challenge that MOOCs face: are they teaching their students to learn how to learn? If not, then they are not liberal arts courses however massive their enrollment, their lack of cost or the ease of internet access.”

“Research of this paper failed to turn up the inductive evidence that MOOCs provide verifiable evidence that they teach students how to learn on their own. All the evidence points to the missing ‘human presence’ element for this failure, generally. However, all is not lost. There are emerging MOOC models that promise to restore the vibrancy of self-learning tools as the core of all curricula.”

“To MOOC or not to MOOC the Liberal Arts? Why Not Consult the Evidence?” by Alexander W. Astin, University of California, Los Angeles


And just for fun: The Fear Factor in Digital Technology

And just a little more fun: :)) !!!

From Cogdog’s Blog

If MOOCs invade, they eventually go away.

“Which brings me to an email from Cathy Davidson, the Future of Educationblah blah blah mumbo jumbo chilly whack long wordy title full of colons, commas, and semi colons… ‘is now over’. Again, I started a MOOC 6 weeks ago, and managed to make it through a week. That is my problem, my fault, not theirs. .. And Cathy’s message does offer the invitation and ways one can continue on, mainly by becoming a member/needle of HASTAC. But the MOOC is over. Period.”  (The Doors “When the Music’s over”)

But you know, the MOOC is Over. The MOOC is Over.

When The MOOC Is Over

by Cathy Morrison

When the MOOC’s over

When the MOOC’s over, yeah

When the MOOC’s over

Turn off the site

Turn off the site

Turn off the site, yeah

When the MOOC’s over

When the MOOC’s over

When the MOOC’s over

Turn off the site

Turn off the site

Turn off the site

For the MOOC is your special friend

Dance on fire as it intends

MOOC is your only friend

Until the end

Until the end

Until the end

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection

Send my credentials to the House of Detention

I got facebook friends inside

The face in the mirror won’t stop

The girl in the window won’t drop

A feast of friends

“Revolution!” she cried

Waitin’ for me


Before I sink

Into the big sleep

I want to hear

I want to hear

The scream of the butterfly

Come back, baby

Back into my course

We’re gettin’ tired of hangin’ around

Waitin’ around with our heads to the ground

I hear a very gentle tweet

Very near yet very far

Very soft, yeah, very clear

Come today, come today

What have they done to education?

What have they done to our fair sister?

Ravaged and plundered and ripped her and bit her

Stuck her with knives in the side of the dawn

And tied her with fences and dragged her down

I hear a very gentle sound

With your ear down to the ground

We want the world and we want it…

We want the world and we want it…




ds106 night, babe

See the light, babe

Save us!

Jim Groom!

Save us!

So when the MOOC’s over

When the MOOC’s over, yeah

When the MOOC’s over

Turn off the site

Turn off the site

Turn off the site

Well the MOOC is your special friend

Dance on fire as it intends

MOOC is your only friend

Until the end

Until the end

Until the end!